Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar este ítem:
https://www.arca.fiocruz.br/handle/icict/31731
Tipo
ArtículoDerechos de autor
Acceso abierto
Fecha del embargo
2020-01-31
Colecciones
- INI - Artigos de Periódicos [3393]
Metadatos
Mostrar el registro completo del ítem
OCULAR TOXOPLASMOSIS: ADVERSE REACTIONS TO TREATMENT IN A BRAZILIAN COHORT
Autor
Afiliación
Fundação Oswaldo Cruz. Instituto Nacional de Infectologia Evandro Chagas. Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil.
Fundação Oswaldo Cruz. Instituto Nacional de Infectologia Evandro Chagas. Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil.
Fundação Oswaldo Cruz. Instituto Nacional de Infectologia Evandro Chagas. Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil.
Fundação Oswaldo Cruz. Instituto Nacional de Infectologia Evandro Chagas. Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil.
Fundação Oswaldo Cruz. Instituto Nacional de Infectologia Evandro Chagas. Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil.
Fundação Oswaldo Cruz. Instituto Nacional de Infectologia Evandro Chagas. Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil.
Fundação Oswaldo Cruz. Instituto Nacional de Infectologia Evandro Chagas. Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil.
Fundação Oswaldo Cruz. Instituto Nacional de Infectologia Evandro Chagas. Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil.
Fundação Oswaldo Cruz. Instituto Nacional de Infectologia Evandro Chagas. Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil.
Fundação Oswaldo Cruz. Instituto Nacional de Infectologia Evandro Chagas. Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil.
Fundação Oswaldo Cruz. Instituto Nacional de Infectologia Evandro Chagas. Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil.
Fundação Oswaldo Cruz. Instituto Nacional de Infectologia Evandro Chagas. Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil.
Fundação Oswaldo Cruz. Instituto Nacional de Infectologia Evandro Chagas. Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil.
Resumen en ingles
Background: The purpose of this study was to estimate the frequency and describe the adverse drug reactions (ADRs) associated with the classic treatment of ocular toxoplasmosis (OT), namely sulfadiazine, pyrimethamine, corticosteroids and folinic acid. Methods: We performed a descriptive study of a prospective cohort of patients with OT treated with the classic therapy. Data were collected during medical consultations and treatment. Results: Of the 147 patients studied, 85% developed one or more ADR. Women presented more ADRs than men (95% vs 77%). Of the total reactions (n=394), 82% were mild, but we found one life-threatening event (Stevens–Johnson syndrome). The most frequent types (71%) of ADRs were gastrointestinal, skin and neurological or psychiatric. The majority of ADRs (90.3%) occurred before the second week of treatment. A third of the patients were treated for the ADR and 10% dropped out of OT treatment. Most (70%) of the ADRs were characterized as being probably caused by the drugs and may be associated with prednisone, sulfadiazine and sulfadiazine/prednisone. Six percent of ADRs were not previously described, such as taste alteration, constipation/bloating, dyspnoea, sweating and somnolence. Conclusions: Our results suggest a high rate of ADRs to OT classic treatment, which requires careful follow-up in order to identify and treat ADRs early.
Compartir