Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://www.arca.fiocruz.br/handle/icict/50516
Type
ArticleCopyright
Open access
Collections
- INI - Artigos de Periódicos [3397]
Metadata
Show full item record
SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY OF A RAPID DIAGNOSTIC TEST FOR CHRONIC CHAGAS DISEASE AT A REFERRAL CENTER IN BRAZIL - CAN IT BE INCLUDED AS A STANDARD SEROLOGICAL DIAGNOSTIC TEST IN THE CLINICAL PRACTICE OF A REFERRAL CENTER?
Author
Affilliation
Fundação Oswaldo Cruz. Instituto Nacional de Infectologia Evandro Chagas. Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil.
Fundação Oswaldo Cruz. Instituto Nacional de Infectologia Evandro Chagas. Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil.
Fundação Oswaldo Cruz. Instituto Nacional de Infectologia Evandro Chagas. Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil.
Fundação Oswaldo Cruz. Instituto Nacional de Infectologia Evandro Chagas. Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil.
Fundação Oswaldo Cruz. Instituto Nacional de Infectologia Evandro Chagas. Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil.
Fundação Oswaldo Cruz. Instituto Nacional de Infectologia Evandro Chagas. Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil.
Fundação Oswaldo Cruz. Instituto Nacional de Infectologia Evandro Chagas. Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil.
Abstract
Introduction: Chagas disease (CD) is a neglected tropical disease. In the chronic phase of CD, the diagnosis is essentially serologic. Conventional reactions are currently in use. More recently, the use of rapid diagnostic testing (RDT) is indicated when conventional techniques are not available. Objective: To evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of RDTs for chronic CD diagnosis. Methodology: Individuals under suspicion of CD were evaluated using ELISA, Chemiluminescence (ChLIA) and RDT tests. Results: The RDT showed 95.1% sensitivity and 96.7% specificity, respectively. Conclusion: The findings of the present study showed that RDT used in the diagnosis of CD at a referral center in Brazil were not able to detect all CD cases when compared to Elisa and ChLIA.
Share