Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://www.arca.fiocruz.br/handle/icict/14112
Type
ArticleCopyright
Open access
Sustainable Development Goals
09 Indústria, inovação e infraestruturaCollections
Metadata
Show full item record
CO-AUTHORSHIP NETWORK ANALYSIS: A POWERFUL TOOL FOR STRATEGIC PLANNING OF RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT AND CAPACITY BUILDING PROGRAMS ON NEGLECTED DISEASES
Affilliation
Fundação Oswaldo Cruz. Centro de Desenvolvimento Tecnológico em Saúde. Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil.
Ministério da Saúde. Departamento de Ciência e Tecnologia. Brasília, DF, Brasil.
Ministério da Saúde. Secretaria de Vigilância em Saúde. Brasília, DF, Brasil.
Ministério da Saúde. Secretaria de Ciência, Tecnologia e Insumos Estratégicos. Brasília, DF, Brasil.
Ministério da Saúde. Departamento de Ciência e Tecnologia. Brasília, DF, Brasil.
Ministério da Saúde. Secretaria de Vigilância em Saúde. Brasília, DF, Brasil.
Ministério da Saúde. Secretaria de Ciência, Tecnologia e Insumos Estratégicos. Brasília, DF, Brasil.
Abstract
Background: New approaches and tools were needed to support the strategic planning, implementation and management of a Program launched by the Brazilian Government to fund research, development and capacity building on neglected tropical diseases with strong focus on the North, Northeast and Center-West regions of the country where these diseases are prevalent. Methodology/Principal Findings: Based on demographic, epidemiological and burden of disease data, seven diseases were selected by the Ministry of Health as targets of the initiative. Publications on these diseases by Brazilian researchers were retrieved from international databases, analyzed and processed with text-mining tools in order to standardize author- and institution’s names and addresses. Co-authorship networks based on these publications were assembled, visualized and analyzed with social network analysis software packages. Network visualization and analysis generated new information, allowing better design and strategic planning of the Program, enabling decision makers to characterize network components by area of work, identify institutions as well as authors playing major roles as central hubs or located at critical network cut-points and readily detect authors or institutions participating in large international scientific collaborating networks. Conclusions/Significance: Traditional criteria used to monitor and evaluate research proposals or R&D Programs, such as researchers’ productivity and impact factor of scientific publications, are of limited value when addressing research areas of low productivity or involving institutions from endemic regions where human resources are limited. Network analysis was found to generate new and valuable information relevant to the strategic planning, implementation and monitoring of the Program. It afforded a more proactive role of the funding agencies in relation to public health and equity goals, to scientific capacity building objectives and a more consistent engagement of institutions and authors from endemic regions based on innovative criteria and parameters anchored on objective scientific data.
Share