Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://www.arca.fiocruz.br/handle/icict/31000
Type
ArticleCopyright
Open access
Embargo date
2020-01-01
Collections
Metadata
Show full item record
COLLABORATION IN SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY ORGANIZATIONS OF THE PUBLIC SECTOR: A NETWORK PERSPECTIVE
Affilliation
Fundação Oswaldo Cruz. Centro de Desenvolvimento Tecnológico em Saúde. Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil / Federal University of Rio de Janeiro. Centro de Tecnologia. Alberto Luiz Coimbra Institute for Graduate Studies and Research in Engineering. Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil.
Federal University of Rio de Janeiro. Centro de Tecnologia. Alberto Luiz Coimbra Institute for Graduate Studies and Research in Engineering. Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil.
Federal University of Rio de Janeiro. Centro de Tecnologia. Alberto Luiz Coimbra Institute for Graduate Studies and Research in Engineering. Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil.
Federal University of Rio de Janeiro. Centro de Tecnologia. Alberto Luiz Coimbra Institute for Graduate Studies and Research in Engineering. Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil.
Federal University of Rio de Janeiro. Centro de Tecnologia. Alberto Luiz Coimbra Institute for Graduate Studies and Research in Engineering. Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil.
Abstract
Engaging in collaborative networks can be an important facilitator of innovation for public sector science and technology (S&T) organizations. It is also an important component of S&T policies that require indicators that can assess the networks through which these organizations innovate. In this study, we apply network indicators to two S&T organizations that are part of the Brazilian public health sector. The indicators cover two complementary perspectives: one that considers the organizations’ scientific networks and the other that considers their technological networks. The indicators allowed
the analysis of the networks in which the organizations were engaged and the understanding of important aspects of their collaboration patterns that can support stra
tegic decisions. The method employed in this paper proved to be a valuable diagnost
ic tool and a useful mechanism for evaluating the performance and supporting the development of S&T institutions.
Share