Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://www.arca.fiocruz.br/handle/icict/44002
POPULATION PHARMACOKINETICS AND BIODISTRIBUTION OF BENZNIDAZOLE IN MICE
Author
Affilliation
Laboratory of Immunopathology. Nucleus of Biological Sciences Research. Federal University of Ouro Preto. Ouro Preto, MG, Brazil
Laboratory of Immunopathology. Nucleus of Biological Sciences Research. Federal University of Ouro Preto. Ouro Preto, MG, Brazil
Laboratory of Clinical Pharmacokinetics. Department of Clinical, Toxicological and Bromatological Analyses. Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences of Ribeirão Preto. University of São Paulo. Ribeirão Preto, SP, São Paulo, Brazil
Laboratory of Immunopathology. Nucleus of Biological Sciences Research. Federal University of Ouro Preto. Ouro Preto, MG, Brazil
Laboratory of Immunopathology. Nucleus of Biological Sciences Research. Federal University of Ouro Preto. Ouro Preto, MG, Brazil
Laboratory of Immunopathology. Nucleus of Biological Sciences Research. Federal University of Ouro Preto. Ouro Preto, MG, Brazil
Laboratory of Immunopathology. Nucleus of Biological Sciences Research. Federal University of Ouro Preto. Ouro Preto, MG, Brazil/Tropical Medicine and International Health Unit. Department of Infectious Diseases. Vall d’Hebron University Hospital. Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona. Barcelona, Spain/PROSICS, Barcelona
Laboratory of Immunopathology. Nucleus of Biological Sciences Research. Federal University of Ouro Preto. Ouro Preto, MG, Brazil/Laboratory of Cellular and Molecular Immunology. René Rachou Institute. Oswaldo Cruz Foundation. Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil
Laboratory of Immunopathology. Nucleus of Biological Sciences Research. Federal University of Ouro Preto. Ouro Preto, MG, Brazil/Laboratory of Morphopathology, Department of Biological Sciences. Nucleus of Biological Sciences Research. Institute of Exact and Biological Sciences. Federal University of Ouro Preto. Ouro Preto, MG, Brazil
Laboratory of Immunopathology. Nucleus of Biological Sciences Research. Federal University of Ouro Preto. Ouro Preto, MG, Brazil/Department of Clinical Analysis. School of Pharmacy. Federal University of Ouro Preto. Ouro Preto, MG, Brazil
Laboratory of Immunopathology. Nucleus of Biological Sciences Research. Federal University of Ouro Preto. Ouro Preto, MG, Brazil
Laboratory of Clinical Pharmacokinetics. Department of Clinical, Toxicological and Bromatological Analyses. Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences of Ribeirão Preto. University of São Paulo. Ribeirão Preto, SP, São Paulo, Brazil
Laboratory of Immunopathology. Nucleus of Biological Sciences Research. Federal University of Ouro Preto. Ouro Preto, MG, Brazil
Laboratory of Immunopathology. Nucleus of Biological Sciences Research. Federal University of Ouro Preto. Ouro Preto, MG, Brazil
Laboratory of Immunopathology. Nucleus of Biological Sciences Research. Federal University of Ouro Preto. Ouro Preto, MG, Brazil
Laboratory of Immunopathology. Nucleus of Biological Sciences Research. Federal University of Ouro Preto. Ouro Preto, MG, Brazil/Tropical Medicine and International Health Unit. Department of Infectious Diseases. Vall d’Hebron University Hospital. Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona. Barcelona, Spain/PROSICS, Barcelona
Laboratory of Immunopathology. Nucleus of Biological Sciences Research. Federal University of Ouro Preto. Ouro Preto, MG, Brazil/Laboratory of Cellular and Molecular Immunology. René Rachou Institute. Oswaldo Cruz Foundation. Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil
Laboratory of Immunopathology. Nucleus of Biological Sciences Research. Federal University of Ouro Preto. Ouro Preto, MG, Brazil/Laboratory of Morphopathology, Department of Biological Sciences. Nucleus of Biological Sciences Research. Institute of Exact and Biological Sciences. Federal University of Ouro Preto. Ouro Preto, MG, Brazil
Laboratory of Immunopathology. Nucleus of Biological Sciences Research. Federal University of Ouro Preto. Ouro Preto, MG, Brazil/Department of Clinical Analysis. School of Pharmacy. Federal University of Ouro Preto. Ouro Preto, MG, Brazil
Abstract
Objectives: To evaluate the population pharmacokinetics of different benznidazole treatment regimens and the drug’s biodistribution in mice.
Methods: Two hundred mice were divided into five groups according to benznidazole dosing regimens: (1) 100 mg/kg/day for 20 days; (2) 100 mg/kg/day for 40 days; (3) 200 mg/kg/day for 20 days; (4) 40 mg/kg/day for 20 days; or (5) 40 mg/kg/day for 40 days. The mice were euthanized and blood, heart, liver, colon and brain were collected. Samples were prepared by liquid-liquid extraction and analysed by HPLC-diode-array detection. The pharmacokinetic analysis of benznidazole was evaluated via non-linear mixed-effects modelling using the NONMEN program.
Results: Our results demonstrate that mouse weight allometrically influences benznidazole clearance; the AUC curve and the highest plasma concentration are dose proportional; benznidazole does not influence its own metabolism; its tissue distribution is limited; and the standard treatment regimen for Chagas’ disease in mice (100 mg/kg/day for 20 days) is inadequate from a pharmacokinetic standpoint, as are the other regimens tested in this study (100 mg/kg/day for 40 days, 200 mg/kg/day for 20 days and 40 mg/kg/day for 20 or 40 days).
Conclusions: Benznidazole reformulations that allow better tissue penetration and plasma and tissue exposure should be evaluated to enable higher cure rates in both animals and patients. The population pharmacokinetic model developed here can allow optimization of the dosing regimen of benznidazole to treat experimental Chagas’ disease. Determining appropriate treatment regimens in animals allows translation of these to clinical studies.
Share