Use este identificador para citar ou linkar para este item:
https://www.arca.fiocruz.br/handle/icict/57903
Tipo de documento
ArtigoDireito Autoral
Acesso aberto
Coleções
- INI - Artigos de Periódicos [3488]
Metadata
Mostrar registro completo
THE IMPACT OF ANTIRETROVIRAL THERAPY AND ISONIAZID PREVENTIVE THERAPY ON TUBERCULOSIS INCIDENCE IN HIV-INFECTED PATIENTS IN RIO DE JANEIRO, BRAZIL
Autor(es)
Afiliação
Johns Hopkins University. Center for Tuberculosis Research and Departments of Medicine and International Health. Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Municipal Health Secretariat. Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.
Municipal Health Secretariat. Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil / Fundação Oswaldo Cruz. Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas Evandro Chagas. Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil / Federal University of Rio de Janeiro. Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.
Municipal Health Secretariat. Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil / Fundação Oswaldo Cruz. Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas Evandro Chagas. Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil / Federal University of Rio de Janeiro. Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.
Johns Hopkins University. Center for Tuberculosis Research and Departments of Medicine and International Health. Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Johns Hopkins University. Center for Tuberculosis Research and Departments of Medicine and International Health. Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Johns Hopkins University. Center for Tuberculosis Research and Departments of Medicine and International Health. Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Johns Hopkins University. Center for Tuberculosis Research and Departments of Medicine and International Health. Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Johns Hopkins University. Center for Tuberculosis Research and Departments of Medicine and International Health. Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Municipal Health Secretariat. Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil / Fundação Oswaldo Cruz. Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas Evandro Chagas. Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil / Federal University of Rio de Janeiro. Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.
Municipal Health Secretariat. Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.
Municipal Health Secretariat. Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil / Fundação Oswaldo Cruz. Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas Evandro Chagas. Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil / Federal University of Rio de Janeiro. Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.
Municipal Health Secretariat. Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil / Fundação Oswaldo Cruz. Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas Evandro Chagas. Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil / Federal University of Rio de Janeiro. Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.
Johns Hopkins University. Center for Tuberculosis Research and Departments of Medicine and International Health. Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Johns Hopkins University. Center for Tuberculosis Research and Departments of Medicine and International Health. Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Johns Hopkins University. Center for Tuberculosis Research and Departments of Medicine and International Health. Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Johns Hopkins University. Center for Tuberculosis Research and Departments of Medicine and International Health. Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Johns Hopkins University. Center for Tuberculosis Research and Departments of Medicine and International Health. Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Municipal Health Secretariat. Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil / Fundação Oswaldo Cruz. Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas Evandro Chagas. Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil / Federal University of Rio de Janeiro. Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.
Resumo em Inglês
Background—Tuberculosis is a common complication and leading cause of death in HIV infection. Antiretroviral therapy (ART) lowers the risk of tuberculosis, but may not be sufficient to control HIV-related tuberculosis. Isoniazid preventive therapy (IPT) reduces tuberculosis incidence significantly, but is not widely used. Methods—We analysed tuberculosis incidence in 11 026 HIV-infected patients receiving medical care at 29 public clinics in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, between 1 September 2003 and 1 September 2005. Data were collected through a retrospective medical record review. We determined rates of tuberculosis in patients who received neither ART nor IPT, only ART, only IPT, or both ART and IPT. Results—The overall tuberculosis incidence was 2.28 cases/100 person-years (PY) [95% confidence interval (CI) 2.06–2.52]. Among patients who received neither ART nor IPT, incidence was 4.01/100 PY. Patients who received ART had an incidence of 1.90/100 PY (95% CI 1.66– 2.17) and those treated with IPT had a rate of 1.27/100 PY (95% CI 0.41–2.95). The incidence among patients who received ART and IPT was 0.80/100 PY (95% CI 0.38–1.47). Multivariate Cox proportional hazards modeling revealed a 76% reduction in tuberculosis risk among patients receiving both ART and IPT (adjusted relative hazard 0.24; P < 0.001) after adjusting for age, previous tuberculosis diagnosis, and CD4 cell counts at baseline. Conclusion—The use of both IPT and ART in HIV-infected patients is associated with significantly reduced tuberculosis incidence. In conjunction with expanded access to ART, the wider use of IPT in patients with HIV will improve tuberculosis control in high burden areas.
Compartilhar