Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://www.arca.fiocruz.br/handle/icict/70148
Type
ArticleCopyright
Open access
Collections
- COC - Artigos de Periódicos [1239]
Metadata
Show full item record
THE DISTRIBUTION OF SCIENCE COMMUNICATION TEACHING AROUND THE GLOBE
Professional development and teaching in science communication
Science communication degree programmes
Science communication teaching
Author
Affilliation
Fundação Oswaldo Cruz. Casa de Oswaldo Cruz. Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil.
University of Western Australia. Perth WA. Austrália.
University in South Africa. África.
Trinity College Dublin. Dublin.Irlanda.
History of Architecture and Science; Science in Society at the University College Dublin School of Art History and Cultural Policy. Dublin. Irlanda.
University of Edinburgh. Edinburgh, Escócia.
Faculty of Science at Utrecht. Utrecht, Amsterdam.
Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro. Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil.
University of the West of England Bristol. Bristol, Inglaterra.
University of Western Australia. Perth WA. Austrália.
University in South Africa. África.
Trinity College Dublin. Dublin.Irlanda.
History of Architecture and Science; Science in Society at the University College Dublin School of Art History and Cultural Policy. Dublin. Irlanda.
University of Edinburgh. Edinburgh, Escócia.
Faculty of Science at Utrecht. Utrecht, Amsterdam.
Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro. Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil.
University of the West of England Bristol. Bristol, Inglaterra.
Abstract
In the context of a special issue of this journal focused on teaching science communication, we present a map of the geographical distribution of 122 science communication teaching programmes from 31 countries around the world. This mapping study resulted from a collaboration between members of the PCST Teaching Forum and the research team at GlobalSCAPE, a research project funded by the European Commission to explore the global state of science communication. Our findings highlight the concentration of these programmes in the U.S.A. and Europe, and the dominance of English as the language of instruction. We ponder the causes and implications of the disparities in opportunities for studying
science communication in other world regions and languages. The dearth of science communication educational pathways in developing countries may limit the professionalisation of the field, as well as research and evidence-based practice that is locally needed and relevant.
Keywords
ProfessionalismProfessional development and teaching in science communication
Science communication degree programmes
Science communication teaching
Share