| Author | Carmo, Maria Beatriz Barreto do | |
| Author | Santos, Leticia Marques dos | |
| Author | Feitosa, Caroline Alves | |
| Author | Fiaccone, Rosemeire Leovigildo | |
| Author | Silva, Nívea Bispo da | |
| Author | Santos, Darci Neves dos | |
| Author | Barreto, Maurício Lima | |
| Author | Amorim, Leila Denise Alves Ferreira | |
| Access date | 2018-02-27T17:52:35Z | |
| Available date | 2018-02-27T17:52:35Z | |
| Document date | 2017 | |
| Citation | CARMO, M. B. B. et al. Screening for common mental disorders using the SRQ-20 in Brazil: what are the alternative strategies for analysis? Revista Brasileira de Psiquiatria, 2017. | pt_BR |
| ISSN | 1516-4446 | pt_BR |
| URI | https://www.arca.fiocruz.br/handle/icict/24988 | |
| Language | eng | pt_BR |
| Publisher | Associação Brasileira de Psiquiatria | pt_BR |
| Rights | open access | pt_BR |
| Subject in Portuguese | Triagem | pt_BR |
| Subject in Portuguese | Saúde mental | pt_BR |
| Subject in Portuguese | Análise multivariada | pt_BR |
| Subject in Portuguese | Análise de classe latente | pt_BR |
| Subject in Portuguese | Análise de correspondência | pt_BR |
| Subject in Portuguese | Brasil | pt_BR |
| Title | Screening for common mental disorders using the SRQ-20 in Brazil: what are the alternative strategies for analysis? | pt_BR |
| Type | Article | pt_BR |
| DOI | 10.1590/1516-4446-2016-2139 | |
| Abstract | To analyze the prevalence of common mental disorders (CMD) assessed with the Self Reporting Questionnaire (SRQ-20), using the established cutoff point, and comparing it with the results of a joint correspondence factor analysis (CFA) and cluster analysis and of a latent class analysis (LCA). Methods: A cross-sectional study was carried out in an urban sample of 1,095 women aged 19 to
55 years. Joint CFA-cluster analysis and LCA were used.
Results: We found a high prevalence of CMD, regardless of classification method (37.6% when using
the cutoff point; 44.4% and 52% for LCA and joint CFA-cluster, respectively). The alternative analysis
strategies describe the cases more efficiently when compared to the traditional cutoff method,
especially regarding more severe symptoms. Both alternative strategies also provide a description of
the SRQ-20 dimensions in their particularities, which may be useful for the planning and implementation
of specific actions in a given population.
Conclusion: The SRQ-20 cutoff point seems to underestimate the magnitude of CMD among women.
The alternative methods of analysis presented herein highlight the different possibilities of using this
important instrument of screening for mental health. | pt_BR |
| Affilliation | Universidade Federal da Bahia. Instituto de Humanidades, Artes e Ciências. Salvador, BA, Brasil | pt_BR |
| Affilliation | Universidade Federal da Bahia. Instituto de Humanidades, Artes e Ciências. Salvador, BA, Brasil | pt_BR |
| Affilliation | Universidade Federal da Bahia. Instituto de Saúde Coletiva. Salvador, BA, Brasil | pt_BR |
| Affilliation | Universidade Federal da Bahia. Instituto de Matemática e Estatística. Departamento de Estatística. Salvador, BA, Brasil | pt_BR |
| Affilliation | Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais. Departamento de Estatística. Belo Horizonte, MG, Brasil | pt_BR |
| Affilliation | Universidade Federal da Bahia. Instituto de Saúde Coletiva. Salvador, BA, Brasil | pt_BR |
| Affilliation | Universidade Federal da Bahia. Instituto de Saúde Coletiva. Salvador, BA, Brasil / Fundação Oswaldo Cruz. Instituto Gonçalo Moniz. Centro de Integração de Dados de Conhecimentos para Saúde. Salvador, BA, Brasil | pt_BR |
| Affilliation | Universidade Federal da Bahia. Instituto de Matemática e Estatística. Departamento de Estatística. Salvador, BA, Brasil | pt_BR |
| Subject | Screening | pt_BR |
| Subject | Mental health | pt_BR |
| Subject | Multivariate analysis | pt_BR |
| Subject | Latent class analysis | pt_BR |
| Subject | Correspondence analysis | pt_BR |
| Subject | Brazil | pt_BR |
| xmlui.metadata.dc.subject.ods | 03 Saúde e Bem-Estar | |
