Autor | Peixoto-Filho, Fernando Maia | pt_BR |
Autor | Sá, Renato Augusto Moreira de | pt_BR |
Autor | Velarde, Luis Guillermo Coca | pt_BR |
Autor | Mocarzel, Carolina de Castro | pt_BR |
Autor | Lopes, Laudelino Marques | pt_BR |
Autor | Ville, Yves | pt_BR |
Data de acesso | 2014-10-07T19:31:41Z | |
Data de disponibilização | 2014-10-07T19:31:41Z | |
Data do publicação | 2013 | |
Citação | PEIXOTO-FILHO, Fernando Maia. et al. Normal range for fetal urine production rate customized by biometry. Arch. gynecol. obstet., Munchen, v. 187, n. 1, p. 31-35, 2013. | pt_BR |
URI | https://www.arca.fiocruz.br/handle/icict/8532 | |
Idioma | eng | pt_BR |
Editor | Springer International | pt_BR |
Direito Autoral | restricted access | |
Título | Normal range for fetal urine production rate customized by biometry | pt_BR |
Tipo do documento | Article | |
DOI | 10.1007/s00404-012-2516-y | pt_BR |
Resumo em Inglês | Objective The aim of this study was to develop a
nomogram for fetal urine production (UPR) using
biometric parameters.
Methods A cross-sectional study was performed in 110
normal singleton fetuses with gestational ages ranging
from 20 to 40 weeks. UPR was measured using tridimensional
ultrasound (3-DUS) virtual organ computer-aided
analysis. UPR (ml/h) was calculated during the filling
phase using the equation, UPR = (VFB2-VFB1)/time.
The values for UPR were plotted as a function of fetal
biometry (femur, humerus, abdominal circumference, and
head circumference and biparietal diameter) to obtain a
nomogram for each parameter.
Results A total of 110 normal singleton fetuses with
gestational age between 20 and 40 weeks were investigated.
Five of them were excluded because the image
quality was insufficient for correct visualization of the
bladder contour. Linear regression analysis of UPR as a
function of femur, humerus, abdominal circumference, and
head circumference and biparietal diameter generated
curves that represents the normal range for UPR by
fetal biometry, and expressed by the following equations:
(1)Humerus length (HL): ln (UPR) = -5.9546 ? 0.0958 9
HL (mm); (R2 0.6422); (2) abdominal circumference:
ln (UPR) = -1.0981 ? 0.158 9 AC (mm); (R2 0.6328);
(3) femur length: ln (UPR) = -1.5133 ? 0.0803 9 FL
(mm); (R2 0.6611); (4) biparietal diameter ln (UPR) =
-7.8779 ? 0.2368 9 BPD-0.0012 9 DBP2; (R2 0.7066).
Although BPD has the highest correlation coefficient
(R2 0.7066) there was no statistical significant difference
between the parameters investigated for UPR prediction.
Conclusion The use of biometric parameters for prediction
of fetal UPR seems to be useful and can avoid the
necessity of building local nomograms for different populations.
The same strategy should be considered to other
fields in fetal medicine. | pt_BR |
Afiliação | Fundação Oswaldo Cruz. Instituto Fernandes Figueira. Departamento de Obstetrícia. Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil. / Grupo Perinatal. Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil. | pt_BR |
Afiliação | Grupo Perinatal. Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil. / Universidade Federal Fluminense. Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil. | pt_BR |
Afiliação | Universidade Federal Fluminense. Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil. | pt_BR |
Afiliação | Grupo Perinatal. Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil. | pt_BR |
Afiliação | The University of Western Ontario. Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry. Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. London, ON, Canada. | pt_BR |
Afiliação | Université Paris Descartes. Department of Obstetrics and Maternal-Fetal Medicine. Paris, France. | pt_BR |
Palavras-chave em inglês | 3D Ultrasonography | pt_BR |
Palavras-chave em inglês | Fetal Bladder Volume Measurement | pt_BR |
Palavras-chave em inglês | Fetal Urine Production Rate | pt_BR |
Palavras-chave em inglês | VOCAL | pt_BR |
DeCS | Ultrassonografia | pt_BR |