Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://www.arca.fiocruz.br/handle/icict/9197
Type
ArticleCopyright
Open access
Collections
- IFF - Artigos de Periódicos [1287]
Metadata
Show full item record
COMPARISON OF PHYSIOLOGICAL AND PERCEPTUAL RESPONSES BETWEEN CONTINUOUS AND INTERMITTENT CYCLING
Author
Affilliation
Universidade Castelo Branco. Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil. / Universidade Celso Lisboa. Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil.
Universidade Celso Lisboa. Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil.
Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro. Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil.
Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro. Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil.
Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro. Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil.
Universidade de Trás-os-Montes e Alto Douro. Departamento de Ciências do Desporto. Vila Real, Portugal. / Centro de Investigação em Ciências do Desporto. Saúde e Desenvolvimento Humano. Vila Real, Portugal.
Universidade Celso Lisboa. Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil.
Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro. Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil.
Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro. Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil.
Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro. Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil.
Universidade de Trás-os-Montes e Alto Douro. Departamento de Ciências do Desporto. Vila Real, Portugal. / Centro de Investigação em Ciências do Desporto. Saúde e Desenvolvimento Humano. Vila Real, Portugal.
Abstract
The present study tested the hypothesis that the exercise protocol (continuous vs. intermittent) would affect the
physiological response and the perception of effort during aquatic cycling. Each protocol was divided on four stages.
Heart rate, arterial blood pressure , blood lactate concentration, central and peripheral rate of perceived exertion were
collected in both protocols in aquatic cycling in 10 women (values are mean ± SD): age=32.8 ± 4.8 years; height=1.62 ±
0.05 cm; body mass=61.60 ± 5.19 kg; estimated body fat=27.13 ± 4.92%. Protocols were compared through two way
ANOVA with Scheffé’s post-hoc test and the test of Mann- Whitney for rate of perceived exertion with α=0.05. No
systematic and consistent differences in heart rate, arterial blood pressure, double product and blood lactate
concentration were found between protocols. On the other hand, central rate of perceived exertion was significantly
higher at stage four during continuous protocol compared with intermittent protocol (p=0.01), while the peripheral rate
of perceived exertion presented higher values at stages three (p=0.02) and four (p=0.00) in the continuous protocol when
compared to the results found in intermittent protocol. These findings suggest that although the aquatic cycling induces
similar physiologic demands in both protocols, the rate of perceived exertion may vary according to the continuous vs.
intermittent nature of the exercise.
Share