Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://www.arca.fiocruz.br/handle/icict/10251
Type
ArticleCopyright
Restricted access
Sustainable Development Goals
03 Saúde e Bem-EstarCollections
- IFF - Artigos de Periódicos [1287]
Metadata
Show full item record
SEVERE ACUTE OBSTETRIC MORBIDITY (NEAR-MISS): A REVIEW OF THE RELATIVE USE OF ITS DIAGNOSTIC INDICATORS
Affilliation
Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro. Instituto de Medicina Social. Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil.
Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro. Instituto de Medicina Social. Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil.
Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro. Instituto de Medicina Social. Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil / Universidade Estácio de Sá. Programa Saúde da Família. Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil.
Fundação Oswaldo Cruz. Instituto Fernandes Figueira. Departamento de Obstetrícia. Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil.
Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro. Instituto de Medicina Social. Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil.
Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro. Instituto de Medicina Social. Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil / Universidade Estácio de Sá. Programa Saúde da Família. Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil.
Fundação Oswaldo Cruz. Instituto Fernandes Figueira. Departamento de Obstetrícia. Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil.
Abstract
Objective To assess the most commonly employed diag-nostic indicators of severe maternal morbidity (obstetric near-miss). Methods Review of the literature from January 1989 to August 2008. Results Fifty-one manuscripts met the eligibility criteria, and 96 indicators were utilized at least once. Admission to intensive care unit (n= 28 studies) was the indicator most frequently utilized, followed by eclampsia and hemorrhage (n= 27), blood transfusion (n= 26) and emergent hysterec-tomy (n=24). Conclusion Considering these Wndings, a trial version of a 13-item instrument for diagnosing obstetric near-miss is proposed. It includes the indicators eclampsia, severe hypertension, pulmonary edema, cardiac arrest, obstetrical hemorrhage, uterine rupture, admission to intensive care unit, emergent hysterectomy, blood transfusion, anesthetic accidents, urea >15 mmol/l or creatinine >400 mmol/l, oli-guria (<400 ml/24 h) and coma. Further studies should focus on consensual deWnitions for these indicators and evaluate the psychometric proprieties of this trial version.
Share