Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://www.arca.fiocruz.br/handle/icict/11828
Type
ArticleCopyright
Open access
Collections
- IOC - Artigos de Periódicos [12967]
Metadata
Show full item record
LUMINEXW: A NEW TECHNOLOGY FOR THE SIMULTANEOUS IDENTIFICATION OF FIVE ENTAMOEBA SPP. COMMONLY FOUND IN HUMAN STOOLS
Author
Affilliation
Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro. Instituto de Microbiologia. Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil / Fundação Oswaldo Cruz. Instituto Oswaldo Cruz. laboratório de Avaliação e Promoção da Saúde Ambiental. Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil.
Center for Global Health. Division of Parasitic Diseases and Malaria. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Atlanta, GA, USA.
Center for Global Health. Division of Parasitic Diseases and Malaria. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Atlanta, GA, USA.
Universidade Federal Fluminense. Departamento de Patologia. Niterói, RJ, Brasil.
Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro. Instituto de Microbiologia. Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil.
Center for Global Health. Division of Parasitic Diseases and Malaria. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Atlanta, GA, USA.
Center for Global Health. Division of Parasitic Diseases and Malaria. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Atlanta, GA, USA.
Center for Global Health. Division of Parasitic Diseases and Malaria. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Atlanta, GA, USA.
Universidade Federal Fluminense. Departamento de Patologia. Niterói, RJ, Brasil.
Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro. Instituto de Microbiologia. Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil.
Center for Global Health. Division of Parasitic Diseases and Malaria. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Atlanta, GA, USA.
Abstract
Background: Six species of the genus Entamoeba, i.e., E. histolytica, E. dispar, E. moshkovskii, E. polecki, E. coli, and E.
hartmanii can be found in human stools. Among these, only E. histolytica is considered to be pathogenic, causing
intestinal and extra-intestinal disease, but it is morphologically identical to E. dispar and E. moshkovskii. In general, E.
polecki, E. coli, and E. hartmanii can be differentiated morphologically from E. histolytica, but some of their diagnostic
morphologic features may overlap creating issues for the differential diagnosis. Moreover, the previous inability to
differentiate among Entamoeba species has limited epidemiologic information on E histolytica. The objective of this study
was to develop a rapid, high-throughput screening method using Luminex technique for the simultaneous detection and
differentiation of Entamoeba species.
Methods: PCR amplification was performed with biotinylated Entamoeba sp 18S rRNA gene primers, designed to amplify
a fragment ranging from 382 to 429 bp of the Entamoeba spp studied. Regions of this fragment that could differentiate
among E. histolytica, E. moshkovskii, E. dispar, E. hartmanii and E. coli were selected to design hybridization probes to link
to Luminex beads. The assay was standardized with cloned DNA samples of each species and evaluated with 24 DNA
extracts from samples obtained from individuals diagnosed with these amebas in their stools.
Results: Using this approach we were able to correctly identify E. histoltyica, E. dispar, E hartmanni, E. coli and E. moshkovskii
in all specimens studied. From twenty four samples tested by microscopy, PCR/DNA Sequencing and real-time PCR, 100%
agreed with PCR-Luminex assay for identification of E. dispar, E. moshkovskii, E. hartmanni, E. histolytica, and E. coli.
Conclusion: These results show that this method could be used in the diagnostic detection of Entamoeba spp in fecal
samples. This diagnostic test was useful to clearly distinguish E histolytica from other species and also to strengthen
epidemiologic data on Entamoeba spp.
Share