Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://www.arca.fiocruz.br/handle/icict/15776
Type
ArticleCopyright
Restricted access
Embargo date
2030-01-01
Collections
- IOC - Artigos de Periódicos [12967]
Metadata
Show full item record
BIOMAGNIFICATION OR BIODILUTION OF MICROCYSTINS IN AQUATIC FOODWEBS? META-ANALYSES OF LABORATORY AND FIELD STUDIES
Blue-green algae
Cyanobacteria
Meta-analysis
Microcystins
Microcystis
Trophic transfer
Affilliation
Universidade Federal do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (UNIRIO). Departamento de Ecologia e Recursos Marinhos. Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil.
Auburn University. Fisheries and Allied Aquacultures. Auburn, AL, USA.
Fundação Oswaldo Cruz. Instituto Oswaldo Cruz. Laboratório de Avaliação e Promoção da Saúde Ambiental. Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil.
Auburn University. Fisheries and Allied Aquacultures. Auburn, AL, USA.
Fundação Oswaldo Cruz. Instituto Oswaldo Cruz. Laboratório de Avaliação e Promoção da Saúde Ambiental. Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil.
Abstract
Cyanobacteria, conspicuous photoprokaryotes in aquatic ecosystems, may produce secondary
metabolites such as the hepatotoxins, microcystins (MC). While MC have been quantified in numerous
aquatic consumers across a variety of ecosystems, there is still debate whether biomagnification or
biodilution of MC generally occurs in aquatic foodwebs. Given the threat that MC pose to aquatic
foodwebs, livestock, and humans, we synthesized data from 42 studies on the concentration of MC in
consumers, such as zooplankton, decapods, molluscs, fishes, turtles and birds, to determine the dominant
process. To compare results across studies, we calculated the biomagnification factor (BMF) as the ratio
between the MC concentration measured in consumers and their diet. Biomagnification is indicated
when BMF mean and associated 95% confidence intervals (CI) >1. Biodilution is shown if a BMF mean and
95% CI <1. As expected, increasing concentrations of MC in diets resulted in increasing concentrations of
MC in consumers. Nevertheless, biodilution of MC was evident for most primary consumers. This finding
was robust across four datasets that focused on different aspects of data independence and variance, and
may be explained by low hydrophobicity of MC, diet preferences, or detoxification. Zooplankton and
zooplanktivorous fish, however, showed some potential for biomagnification (i.e. mean BMF > 1).
Plausible, but largely unexplored, possibilities for the relatively higher MC accumulation by these
consumers are low detoxification efficiency by zooplankton, MC trophic transfer via the microbial
foodweb, contamination of zooplankton net samples with large cyanobacterial colonies and filaments, or
the release of both free and bound MC in zooplankton during digestion by fish. Factors related to study
design may have influenced the magnitude of MC biodilution. For example, consumers fed diets
consisting of highly toxic cyanobacterial lab cultures and large, potentially inedible net phytoplankton
showed greater biodilution when compared to seston. Given their hepatotoxic nature, MC concentrations
were relatively higher in liver and hepatopancreas tissues than other tissues. Whole organisms exhibited,
however, relatively greater MC (i.e. higher BMF) than specific tissues, and this finding could be attributed
to the contribution of zooplankton to whole organism MC analyses (89% of BMF estimates > 1). Finally,
BMF was positively related to study length showing that longer exposure to toxic food resulted in higher
MC accumulation in consumers, which could have important implications in eutrophic or tropical
systems where toxic blooms may persist year-round.
Keywords
AnabaenaBlue-green algae
Cyanobacteria
Meta-analysis
Microcystins
Microcystis
Trophic transfer
Share