Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://www.arca.fiocruz.br/handle/icict/29643
Type
ArticleCopyright
Restricted access
Embargo date
2028-08-30
Collections
- INI - Artigos de Periódicos [3646]
Metadata
Show full item record
COST-EFFECTIVENESS OF GENOTYPE TESTING FOR PRIMARY RESISTANCE IN BRAZIL
Author
Affilliation
Fundação Oswaldo Cruz. Instituto Nacional de Infectologia Evandro Chagas. Laboratório de Pesquisa Clínica em DST/AIDS. Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil.
Division of General Medicine. The Medical Practice Evaluation Center. USA.
Fundação Oswaldo Cruz. Instituto Nacional de Infectologia Evandro Chagas. Laboratório de Pesquisa Clínica em DST/AIDS. Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil.
Division of General Medicine. The Medical Practice Evaluation Center. USA./ Massachusetts General Hospital. Division of Infectious Disease. Boston, MA, USA / Harvard Medical School. Harvard University Center for AIDS Research. Boston, MA, USA / Boston University School of Public Health. Department of Epidemiology. Boston, MA, USA / Harvard School of Public Health. Department of Health Policy and Management. Boston, MA. USA.
Fundação Oswaldo Cruz. Instituto Nacional de Infectologia Evandro Chagas. Laboratório de Pesquisa Clínica em DST/AIDS. Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil.
Division of General Medicine. The Medical Practice Evaluation Center. USA./ Massachusetts General Hospital. Division of Infectious Disease. Boston, MA, USA / Harvard Medical School. Harvard University Center for AIDS Research. Boston, MA, USA / Brigham and Women's Hospital. Department of Medicine. Division of Infectious Disease. Boston, MA, USA.
The Medical Practice Evaluation Center. Brigham and Women's Hospital. Department of Orthopedic Surgery. Boston, MA, USA / Boston University School of Public Health. Department of Biostatistics. Boston, MA, USA.
Division of General Medicine. The Medical Practice Evaluation Center. USA.
Division of General Medicine. The Medical Practice Evaluation Center. USA.
Harvard Medical School. Harvard University Center for AIDS Research. Boston, MA, USA / Brigham and Women's Hospital. Department of Medicine. Division of Infectious Disease. Boston, MA, USA.
Fundação Oswaldo Cruz. Instituto Nacional de Infectologia Evandro Chagas. Laboratório de Pesquisa Clínica em DST/AIDS. Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil.
Yale School of Public Health. New Haven, CT, USA.
Division of General Medicine. The Medical Practice Evaluation Center. USA.
Fundação Oswaldo Cruz. Instituto Nacional de Infectologia Evandro Chagas. Laboratório de Pesquisa Clínica em DST/AIDS. Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil.
Division of General Medicine. The Medical Practice Evaluation Center. USA./ Massachusetts General Hospital. Division of Infectious Disease. Boston, MA, USA / Harvard Medical School. Harvard University Center for AIDS Research. Boston, MA, USA / Boston University School of Public Health. Department of Epidemiology. Boston, MA, USA / Harvard School of Public Health. Department of Health Policy and Management. Boston, MA. USA.
Fundação Oswaldo Cruz. Instituto Nacional de Infectologia Evandro Chagas. Laboratório de Pesquisa Clínica em DST/AIDS. Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil.
Division of General Medicine. The Medical Practice Evaluation Center. USA./ Massachusetts General Hospital. Division of Infectious Disease. Boston, MA, USA / Harvard Medical School. Harvard University Center for AIDS Research. Boston, MA, USA / Brigham and Women's Hospital. Department of Medicine. Division of Infectious Disease. Boston, MA, USA.
The Medical Practice Evaluation Center. Brigham and Women's Hospital. Department of Orthopedic Surgery. Boston, MA, USA / Boston University School of Public Health. Department of Biostatistics. Boston, MA, USA.
Division of General Medicine. The Medical Practice Evaluation Center. USA.
Division of General Medicine. The Medical Practice Evaluation Center. USA.
Harvard Medical School. Harvard University Center for AIDS Research. Boston, MA, USA / Brigham and Women's Hospital. Department of Medicine. Division of Infectious Disease. Boston, MA, USA.
Fundação Oswaldo Cruz. Instituto Nacional de Infectologia Evandro Chagas. Laboratório de Pesquisa Clínica em DST/AIDS. Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil.
Yale School of Public Health. New Haven, CT, USA.
Abstract
Objective: HIV genotype-resistance testing can help identify more effective antiretroviral treatment (ART) regimens for patients, substantially increasing the likelihood of viral suppression and immune recovery. We sought to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of genotype-resistance testing before first-line ART initiation in Brazil.
Design: We used a previously published microsimulation model of HIV disease (CEPAC-International) and data from Brazil to compare the clinical impact, costs, and cost-effectiveness of initial genotype testing (Genotype) with no initial genotype testing (No genotype). Methods: Model parameters were derived from the HIV Clinical Cohort at the Evandro Chagas Clinical Research Institute and from published data, using Brazilian sources whenever possible. Baseline patient characteristics included 69% male, mean age of 36 years (SD, 10 years), mean CD4 count of 347 per microliter (SD, 300/µL) at ART initiation, annual ART costs from 2012 US $1400 to US $13,400, genotype test cost of US $230, and primary resistance prevalence of 4.4%. Life expectancy and costs were discounted 3% per year. Genotype was defined as "cost-effective" compared with No Genotype if its incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was less than 3 times the 2012 Brazilian per capita GDP of US $12,300. Results: Compared with No genotype, Genotype increased life expectancy from 18.45 to 18.47 years and reduced lifetime cost from US $45,000 to $44,770; thus, in the base case, Genotype was cost saving. Genotype was cost-effective at primary resistance prevalence as low as 1.4% and remained cost-effective when subsequent-line ART costs decreased to 30% of baseline value. Cost-inefficient results were observed only when simultaneously holding multiple parameters to extremes of their plausible ranges. Conclusions: Genotype-resistance testing in ART-naive individuals in Brazil will improve survival and decrease costs and should be incorporated into HIV treatment guidelines in Brazil.
Share