Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://www.arca.fiocruz.br/handle/icict/32215
Type
ArticleCopyright
Restricted access
Embargo date
2022-01-01
Collections
- IOC - Artigos de Periódicos [12967]
Metadata
Show full item record
OUT OF SOUTH AMERICA: MULTIPLE ORIGINS OF NON-NATIVE APPLE SNAILS IN ASIA
Affilliation
University of Hawaii. Pacific Biosciences Research Center. Center for Conservation Research and Training. Honolulu, Hawaii / University of Hawaii. Department of Zoology. Honolulu, Hawaii.
Philippine Rice Research Institute. Maligaya. Science City of Muñoz, Nueva Ecija 3119, Philippines.
Fundação Oswaldo Cruz. Instituto Oswaldo Cruz. Departamento de Malacologia. Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil.
University of Hawaii. Pacific Biosciences Research Center. Center for Conservation Research and Training. Honolulu, Hawaii.
Philippine Rice Research Institute. Maligaya. Science City of Muñoz, Nueva Ecija 3119, Philippines.
Fundação Oswaldo Cruz. Instituto Oswaldo Cruz. Departamento de Malacologia. Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil.
University of Hawaii. Pacific Biosciences Research Center. Center for Conservation Research and Training. Honolulu, Hawaii.
Abstract
Apple snails (Ampullariidae:
Pomacea
) native to the New World have become agricultural and environmental pests widely in southern and eastern Asia since their introduction in about 1980. Although their impacts have been extensively documented, considerable confusion persists regarding their identities and geographical origins. Efforts to resolve the confusion have suffered from inadequate taxonomic and geographical sampling from both native and introduced ranges. Using phylogenetic and genealogical methods, we analysed 610–655 bp of cytochrome
c
oxidase subunit I DNA sequences from 783 apple snails from 164 Asian locations and 57 native South American locations. In Asia, we found four species of
Pomacea
in two clades: (1)
Pomacea canaliculata
and
P. insularum
, and (2)
P. scalaris
and
P. diffusa
. Parsimony networks and mismatch distributions indicate that the non-native ranges of the two most widespread species,
P. canaliculata
and
P. insularum
, probably result from multiple introductions. Molecular analyses are consistent with early accounts; non-native
P. canaliculata
populations trace back to multiple locations in Argentina and have probably been introduced more than once. In contrast,
P. insularum
was probably introduced from Brazil and Argentina independently. Multiple introductions may, in part, explain the success and rapid spread of these two species. Unlike
P. canaliculata
and
P. insularum
,
P. scalaris
and
P. diffusa
were probably introduced through the aquarium trade, derived originally from Argentina and Brazil, respectively. Possible physiological, ecological, and native range differences among these four species highlight the importance of accurate identification in understanding invasion patterns and processes, which is vital in developing and implementing management strategies.
Share