Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://www.arca.fiocruz.br/handle/icict/57479
Type
ArticleCopyright
Open access
Collections
- INI - Artigos de Periódicos [3504]
Metadata
Show full item record
PREDICTORS OF VIROLOGIC OUTCOME AMONG PEOPLE LIVING WITH HIV WHO CONTINUE A PROTEASE INHIBITOR-BASED ANTIRETROVIRAL REGIMEN FOLLOWING VIROLOGIC FAILURE WITH NO OR LIMITED RESISTANCE
Author
Affilliation
Case Western Reserve University. Cleveland, OH, USA.
Fundação Oswaldo Cruz. Instituto Nacional de Infectologia Evandro Chagas. Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil.
Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health. Boston, MA, USA.
University of Washington. Seattle, WA, USA.
DLH Company. Social & Scientifc System. Silver Spring, MD, USA.
University of Pennsylvania. Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases. Bethesda, MD, USA.
YR Gaitonde Center for AIDS Research and Education. Chennai, India.
University of North Carolina Project–Malawi. Lilongwe, Malawi.
University of Pittsburgh. Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Lancet Laboratories and BARC SA. Johannesburg, South Africa.
Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health. Boston, MA, USA.
Fundação Oswaldo Cruz. Instituto Nacional de Infectologia Evandro Chagas. Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil.
Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health. Boston, MA, USA.
University of Washington. Seattle, WA, USA.
DLH Company. Social & Scientifc System. Silver Spring, MD, USA.
University of Pennsylvania. Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases. Bethesda, MD, USA.
YR Gaitonde Center for AIDS Research and Education. Chennai, India.
University of North Carolina Project–Malawi. Lilongwe, Malawi.
University of Pittsburgh. Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Lancet Laboratories and BARC SA. Johannesburg, South Africa.
Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health. Boston, MA, USA.
Abstract
Background: Treatment management after repeated failure of antiretroviral therapy (ART) is difcult due to resistance and adherence challenges. For people who have failed non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor-(NNRTI-) and
protease inhibitor-(PI-) based regimens with no or limited resistance, remaining on PI-based ART is an option. Using data from an ART strategy trial (A5288) in low/middle-income countries which included this option, we explored whether predictors can be identifed distinguishing those who experienced further virologic failure from those who achieved and maintained virologic suppression. Methods: A5288 enrolled people with confrmed HIV-1 RNA≥1000 copies/mL after ≥24 weeks of PI-based ART and prior failure on NNRTI-based ART. This analysis focused on the 278 participants with no resistance to the PI being taken and no or limited nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NRTI) resistance, who continued their PI with fexibility to change NRTIs. Proportional hazards models were used to evaluate predictors of virologic failure during follow-up (VF: confrmed HIV-1 RNA≥1000 copies/mL at ≥24 weeks of follow-up). Results: 56% of participants were female. At study entry, median age was 40 years, time on ART 7.8 years, CD4 count 169 cells/mm3, HIV-1 RNA 20,444 copies/mL; and 37% had NRTI resistance. The estimated proportion experiencing VF increased from 39% at week 24 to 60% at week 96. In multivariable analysis, signifcant predictors at study entry of VF were higher HIV-1 RNA (adjusted hazard ratio: 2.20 for ≥10,000 versus <10,000 copies/mL), lower age (1.96 for <30 versus ≥30 years), NRTI resistance (1.74 for present versus absent), lower CD4 count (1.73 for <200 versus ≥200 cells/mm3), and shorter ART duration (1.62 for <10 versus ≥10 years). There was a strong trend in proportion with VF at week 96 with the number of these fve risk factors that a participant had, varying from 8% for zero, to 31%, 40%, 73%, and 100% for one, two, three, and four/fve. Only 13% of participants developed new NRTI or PI resistance mutations.
Share