Background & aim: Among critical patients, there is an early onset of changes in both the quantity and quality of muscle mass. It is essential to find tools that promptly identify this muscle mass loss. The aim of this study was to compare the ultrasonography of the quadriceps femoris to the gold standard, thigh computed tomography (CT) for assessing the musculature of critically ill patients with different body mass index who have suffered traumatic brain injury. Methods: This is a prospective validation study in an Intensive Care Unit (ICU) specialized in trauma care, located at a tertiary teaching hospital. Our study involved a convenience sample of patients. Sequential ultrasound and CT scans were performed at three distinct time intervals: upon admission, between 24 and 96 h' post-admission, and finally, between 96 and 168 h' post-admission. For all ultrasound measurements, we conducted simultaneous quadriceps CT measurements. The correlation between measurements obtained by ultrasound and computed tomography at three different times and in three BMI ranges was analyzed, in individuals with normal weight, overweight and obese. Results: Results: We analyzed 252 images in 49 patients in time 1, 40 patients in time 2, and 37 in time 3 to compare the thickness quadriceps muscle using US and CT. Of these, 18 patients had a BMI _ 24.9 kg/ m2 (normal weight), 18 patients from 25 to 29.9 kg/m2 (overweight), and 8 patients had a BMI 30 kg/ m2 (obese). The mean age was 37 years, the majority (94%) were male and the main comorbidities were: hypertension 12%, diabetes 4% and 14% smoking. The results revealed minor discrepancies between measurements obtained through the two methods, these changes were not influenced by the body mass index, with these variations being practically insignificant in the context of clinical application. Thus, the correlation and concordance between the values obtained found a strong positive correlation with good limits of agreement. The Spearman's correlation coefficients obtained were r ¼ 0.89, 0.91 and 0.88, p < 0.01 at T1, T2 and T3 respectively for normal weight, r ¼ 0.91, 0.80 and 0.81, p < 0.01 at T1, T2 and T3 respectively for overweight and r ¼ 0.89, 0.94 and 0.84, p < 0.01 at T1, T2 and T3 respectively for obesity. In addition to a positive correlation, we observed a high agreement between the methods. The Bland & Altman analysis at time 1 showed, respectively, the bias of 1.46, 2.03 and 0.76. At time 2, the bias was 0.42, 3.11 and 2.12. At time 3, the bias was 2.26, 3.38 and 2.11 mm. Conclusion: Our findings suggest that measure femoral quadriceps muscle thickness ultrasound-based exhibits a comparable performance to thigh CT. This conclusion stems from the excellent correlation and good agreement observed between ultrasound and CT, which is considered the gold standard for muscle assessment in critically ill patients.