Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://www.arca.fiocruz.br/handle/icict/64217
Type
ArticleCopyright
Open access
Sustainable Development Goals
03 Saúde e Bem-EstarCollections
- ENSP - Artigos de Periódicos [2412]
- ICICT - Artigos de Periódicos [1419]
Metadata
Show full item record
THE APPLICATION OF IBEROAMERICAN STUDY OF ADVERSE EVENTS (IBEAS) METHODOLOGY IN BRAZILIAN HOSPITALS
Adverse events
Epidemiology and detection
Healthcare quality improvement
Hospital medicine
Affilliation
Fundação Oswaldo Cruz. Escola Nacional de Saúde Pública Sergio Arouca. Departamento Administração e Planejamento em Saúde. Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil.
Fundação Oswaldo Cruz. Instituto de Comunicação e Informação Científica e Tecnológica em Saúde. Laboratório de Informação em Saúde. Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil.
Fundação Oswaldo Cruz. Escola Nacional de Saúde Pública Sergio Arouca. Departamento Administração e Planejamento em Saúde. Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil.
Fundação Oswaldo Cruz. Escola Nacional de Saúde Pública Sergio Arouca. Departamento Administração e Planejamento em Saúde. Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil.
Fundação Oswaldo Cruz. Instituto de Comunicação e Informação Científica e Tecnológica em Saúde. Laboratório de Informação em Saúde. Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil.
Fundação Oswaldo Cruz. Escola Nacional de Saúde Pública Sergio Arouca. Departamento Administração e Planejamento em Saúde. Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil.
Fundação Oswaldo Cruz. Escola Nacional de Saúde Pública Sergio Arouca. Departamento Administração e Planejamento em Saúde. Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil.
Abstract
Objective: To assess the prevalence of adverse events (AE) and to investigate its association with factors related to the patient and to hospital admission. Design: Cross-sectional study. Setting: Four general hospitals located in the southeastern region of Brazil. Participants: All patients admitted to the participating hospitals at the time of the study were surveyed. Intervention: The methodology was based on the Iberoamerican study of adverse events, a twostage medical record review. Main Outcome Measure: Medical records were screened for AE only in the day (24-h) immediately before the review process, independently of the admission date. Results: A total of 695 admissions were examined. Prevalence was 12.8%. Almost 43% of AE were preventable. More than 60% of patients with an event prolonged hospital stay. In final regression model, urgent admission (OR: 2.68; Confidence Interval (CI) 95%: 1.53–4.69), submission to a procedure (odds ratio (OR): 2.41; CI 95%: 1.33–4.39), presence of central venous catheter (OR: 2.25; CI 95%: 1.14–4.41) and immunosuppressive therapy (OR: 3.41; CI 95%: 1.57–7.40) were statistically associated with AE. Conclusions: Our results indicate that around 1.3 AE happen in each 10 hospital admissions in Brazil. As patient safety continues to be a Public Health concern worldwide and mainly in developing countries, this would indicate the potential use of prevalence measures for monitoring patient safety in Brazilian context.
Keywords
Patient safetyAdverse events
Epidemiology and detection
Healthcare quality improvement
Hospital medicine
Share