Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://www.arca.fiocruz.br/handle/icict/9277
Type
ArticleCopyright
Open access
Sustainable Development Goals
03 Saúde e Bem-EstarCollections
Metadata
Show full item record
AN ASSESSMENT OF PROGRESS TOWARDS UNIVERSAL HEALTH COVERAGE IN BRAZIL, RUSSIA, INDIA, CHINA, AND SOUTH AFRICA (BRICS)
Author
Affilliation
Health Economics Unit. University of Cape Town.
Cape Town, South Africa.
National Research University. Higher School of Economics. Moscou, Rússia.
Peking University. School of Public Health. Beijing, China.
Public Health Foundation of India. New Delhi, India.
The Rockefeller Foundation. New York, NY, USA.
The Rockefeller Foundation. New York, NY, USA / London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine. London, UK .
Fundação Oswaldo Cruz. Instituto de Comunicação e Informação Científica e Tecnológica em Saúde. Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil.
National Research University. Higher School of Economics. Moscou, Rússia.
Peking University. School of Public Health. Beijing, China.
Public Health Foundation of India. New Delhi, India.
The Rockefeller Foundation. New York, NY, USA.
The Rockefeller Foundation. New York, NY, USA / London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine. London, UK .
Fundação Oswaldo Cruz. Instituto de Comunicação e Informação Científica e Tecnológica em Saúde. Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil.
Abstract
Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa (BRICS) represent almost half the world’s population, and all fi ve
national governments recently committed to work nationally, regionally, and globally to ensure that universal health
coverage (UHC) is achieved. This analysis reviews national eff orts to achieve UHC. With a broad range of health
indicators, life expectancy (ranging from 53 years to 73 years), and mortality rate in children younger than 5 years
(ranging from 10·3 to 44·6 deaths per 1000 livebirths), a review of progress in each of the BRICS countries shows that
each has some way to go before achieving UHC. The BRICS countries show substantial, and often similar, challenges
in moving towards UHC. On the basis of a review of each country, the most pressing problems are: raising insuffi cient
public spending; stewarding mixed private and public health systems; ensuring equity; meeting the demands for
more human resources; managing changing demographics and disease burdens; and addressing the social
determinants of health. Increases in public funding can be used to show how BRICS health ministries could accelerate
progress to achieve UHC. Although all the BRICS countries have devoted increased resources to health, the biggest
increase has been in China, which was probably facilitated by China’s rapid economic growth. However, the BRICS
country with the second highest economic growth, India, has had the least improvement in public funding for health.
Future research to understand such diff erent levels of prioritisation of the health sector in these countries could be
useful. Similarly, the role of strategic purchasing in working with powerful private sectors, the eff ect of federal
structures, and the implications of investment in primary health care as a foundation for UHC could be explored.
These issues could serve as the basis on which BRICS countries focus their eff orts to share ideas and strategies.
Share