Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://www.arca.fiocruz.br/handle/icict/59347
Type
ArticleCopyright
Open access
Sustainable Development Goals
03 Saúde e Bem-EstarCollections
Metadata
Show full item record
A REPORTING TOOL FOR ADAPTED GUIDELINES IN HEALTH CARE: THE RIGHT-AD@PT CHECKLIST
Author
Affilliation
Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona. Programme in Methodology of Biomedical Research and Public Health. Barcelona, Spain / Biomedical Research Institute Sant Pau. Iberoamerican Cochrane Centre. Barcelona, Spain.
Biomedical Research Institute Sant Pau. Iberoamerican Cochrane Centre. Barcelona, Spain / Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Epidemiología y Salud Pública. Madrid, Spain.
Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Epidemiología y Salud Pública. Madrid, Spain.
Sem afiliação.
Utrecht University. University Medical Centre Utrecht. Department of Nephrology and Hypertension and Julius Centre for Health Sciences and Primary Care. Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Weill Cornell Medicine-Qatar. Doha, Qatar.
The George Institute for Global Health. Meta-research & Evidence Synthesis Unit. New Delhi, India.
Lanzhou University. School of Basic Medical Sciences. Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences. Research Unit of Evidence-Based Evaluation and Guidelines. Lanzhou, China / World Health Organization Collaborating Centre for Guideline Implementation and Knowledge Translation. Lanzhou, China.
National Health and Medical Research Council. Canberra, ACT, Australia.
World Health Organization. Partnership for Maternal, Newborn & Child Health. Geneve, Switzerland.
Universidad de Antofagasta. Facultad de Medicina y Odontología. Antofagasta, Chile.
McMaster University. Department of Medicine. Hamilton, Canada / McGRADE Centres. Hamilton, Canada / Michael G. DeGroote Cochrane Canada. Hamilton, Canada / Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact. Hamilton, Canada / Humanitas University. Department of Biomedical Sciences. Milan, Italy.
American University of Beirut. Department of Internal Medicine. Beirut, Lebanon / McMaster University. Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact. Hamilton, Canada.
Múltipla autoria - ver em Notas
Biomedical Research Institute Sant Pau. Iberoamerican Cochrane Centre. Barcelona, Spain / Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Epidemiología y Salud Pública. Madrid, Spain.
Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Epidemiología y Salud Pública. Madrid, Spain.
Sem afiliação.
Utrecht University. University Medical Centre Utrecht. Department of Nephrology and Hypertension and Julius Centre for Health Sciences and Primary Care. Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Weill Cornell Medicine-Qatar. Doha, Qatar.
The George Institute for Global Health. Meta-research & Evidence Synthesis Unit. New Delhi, India.
Lanzhou University. School of Basic Medical Sciences. Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences. Research Unit of Evidence-Based Evaluation and Guidelines. Lanzhou, China / World Health Organization Collaborating Centre for Guideline Implementation and Knowledge Translation. Lanzhou, China.
National Health and Medical Research Council. Canberra, ACT, Australia.
World Health Organization. Partnership for Maternal, Newborn & Child Health. Geneve, Switzerland.
Universidad de Antofagasta. Facultad de Medicina y Odontología. Antofagasta, Chile.
McMaster University. Department of Medicine. Hamilton, Canada / McGRADE Centres. Hamilton, Canada / Michael G. DeGroote Cochrane Canada. Hamilton, Canada / Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact. Hamilton, Canada / Humanitas University. Department of Biomedical Sciences. Milan, Italy.
American University of Beirut. Department of Internal Medicine. Beirut, Lebanon / McMaster University. Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact. Hamilton, Canada.
Múltipla autoria - ver em Notas
Abstract
Background: Adaptation of existing guidelines can be an efficient way to develop contextualized recommendations. Transparent reporting of the adaptation approach can support the transparency and usability of the adapted guidelines. Objective: To develop an extension of the RIGHT (Reporting Items for practice Guidelines in HealThcare) statement for the reporting of adapted guidelines (including recommendations that have been adopted, adapted, or developed de novo), the RIGHT-Ad@pt checklist. Design: A multistep process was followed to develop the checklist: establishing a working group, generating an initial checklist, optimizing the checklist (through an initial assessment of adapted guidelines, semistructured interviews, a Delphi consensus survey, an external review, and a final assessment of adapted guidelines), and approval of the final checklist by the working group.
Setting: International collaboration. Participants: A total of 119 professionals participated in the development process.
Measurements: Participants' consensus on items in the checklist. Results: The RIGHT-Ad@pt checklist contains 34 items grouped in 7 sections: basic information (7 items); scope (6 items); rigor of development (10 items); recommendations (4 items); external review and quality assurance (2 items); funding, declaration, and management of interest (2 items); and other information (3 items). A user guide with explanations and real-world examples for each item was developed to provide a better user experience.
Limitation: The RIGHT-Ad@pt checklist requires further validation in real-life use.
Conclusion: The RIGHT-Ad@pt checklist has been developed to improve the reporting of adapted guidelines, focusing on the standardization, rigor, and transparency of the process and the clarity and explicitness of adapted recommendations.
Primary funding source: None.
Share