Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://www.arca.fiocruz.br/handle/icict/7187
Type
ArticleCopyright
Open access
Collections
- ICICT - Artigos de Periódicos [1382]
- INI - Artigos de Periódicos [3488]
Metadata
Show full item record
IS THE PREVALENCE OF DRIVING AFTER DRINKING HIGHER IN ENTERTAINMENT AREAS?
The authors thank FAPERJ for the scholarship for RDB and long-term support for FIB’s analyses of alcohol misuse and related harmful effects, as well as to Renata Limberger and Fernanda Oliveira ’teams for conducting ELISA analyses.
Author
Affilliation
Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul. Centro de Pesquisa de Droga e Álcool. Porto Alegre, RS, Brasil
Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul. Centro de Pesquisa de Droga e Álcool. Porto Alegre, RS, Brasil
Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística. Escola Nacional de Ciências Estatísticas. Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil
Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística. Escola Nacional de Ciências Estatísticas. Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil
Fundação Oswaldo Cruz. Instituto de Comunicação e Informação Científica e Tecnológica em Saúde. Laboratório de Informação em Saúde. Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil
Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul. Centro de Pesquisa de Droga e Álcool. Porto Alegre, RS, Brasil
Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística. Escola Nacional de Ciências Estatísticas. Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil
Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística. Escola Nacional de Ciências Estatísticas. Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil
Fundação Oswaldo Cruz. Instituto de Comunicação e Informação Científica e Tecnológica em Saúde. Laboratório de Informação em Saúde. Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil
Abstract
Aims: This study aimed to estimate the prevalence of driving after drinking (DUI) and its associated factors in low and high alcohol outlet density areas (LAOD and HAOD) in Porto Alegre, Brazil. Methods: A probability 3-stage sampling survey was conducted, and 683 drivers who were leaving alcohol outlets (AOs) and had been drinking were interviewed, breathalyzed and saliva was collected for drug screening. Prevalences were assessed using domain estimation and DUI predictors were assessed using logistic models.
Results: It was estimated that 151,573 drivers drank at the AO, and intention to DUI was more prevalent in LAOD (59.3 versus 46.1% in HAOD, P = 0.003). On the other hand, HAOD had higher proportions of interviewees with a blood alcohol concentration (BAC) of >0.06% (46.6 versus 30.7%, P = 0.002) as well as a more frequent use of cocaine (9.3 versus 2.4%, P = 0.086). In the logistic models, drinking in a LAOD stratum was found to be associated with DUI (OR 1.72 (1.17 – 2.5)) and the two AO density areas presented different factors independently associated with DUI: THC use was significantly associated with the outcome in the HAOD stratum (OR 17.7 - 5.1 – 61.8)), whereas an AUDIT score of >20 was positively associated with DUI in LAOD (OR 23.75 (1.5 – 364.0)). Conclusions: High prevalences of driving under the influence of alcohol were evident in both the high and the low outlet density areas, although with different characteristics. Thorough enforcement of the legislation by random breath testing and sobriety checkpoints should be combined with AO licensing in order to reduce high levels of DUI and traffic accidents.
Publisher
The Medical Council on Alcohol
Citation
BONI, Raquel de et al. Is the prevalence of driving after drinking higher in entertainment areas? Alcohol Alcohol, v. 48, n. 3, p. 356-362, May/Jun. 2013.Notes
Raquel de Boni. Fundação Oswaldo Cruz. Instituto Nacional de Infectologia Evandro Chagas. Documento produzido em parceria ou por autor vinculado à Fiocruz, mas não consta a informação no documento.The authors thank FAPERJ for the scholarship for RDB and long-term support for FIB’s analyses of alcohol misuse and related harmful effects, as well as to Renata Limberger and Fernanda Oliveira ’teams for conducting ELISA analyses.
Share